Tuesday, May 26 · 11:30 AM – 5:00 PM

Positioning & messaging, together.

Building on the April strategy, we'll refine MMGY's positioning and pressure-test the messaging pillars. By 5pm we want a working positioning direction, a point of view on creativity's role, and a refined set of pillars — plus clear next steps.

11:30 – 12:30

Lunch & frame the day

Settle in and get aligned on what we're trying to accomplish — and what would count as a good day.

12:30 – 3:00

Positioning

The core working session. We'll work toward a positioning hypothesis that resonates across both DMO and private-sector audiences and gives MMGY a defensible claim against the broader competitive set.

  • The expanded competitive landscape, including the big creative shops
  • Candidate positioning directions to react to and build on
  • A closer look at two positioning directions
  • Landing on a working positioning hypothesis
3:00 – 3:15

Break

3:15 – 4:30

Messaging pillars

Re-visit the four pillars from the April presentation against the refined positioning and decide what stays, what evolves, and what may need to change.

4:30 – 5:00

Wrap up & next steps

Capture where we landed, what's still open, and who owns what.

Competitor insights

Four patterns to anchor the positioning conversation.

Read each insight on its own, then click to see the competitor evidence underneath. These are the patterns we'll work from in the positioning conversation — what the matrix shows us about where MMGY's positioning can build from.

Insight 01

Competitors at this scale are increasingly inventing the category they compete in.

"Engineering Brand Love." "Big Indie." "Business Agency." "Connected brands." The competitors winning at this scale have coined a phrase or claimed a label that didn't exist before. They're not winning the existing axis — they're declaring a new one.

The evidence

Shipyard

"Engineering Brand Love."

Not "advertising agency." Not "integrated agency." A phrase that didn't exist until they coined it — pairing an emotional outcome with a word that signals rigor. It's a category of one.

BarkleyOKRP

"Big Indie."

A two-word category they claim entirely. The existing categories — holding company, boutique — both already had homes. They named a new one that frames both as inadequate.

Gale

"The industry's only Business Agency."

Gale positions itself as something other than "media agency," "creative agency," or "integrated agency" — claiming a pocket between traditional agencies and management consultancies. The "Business Agency" label is a category they invented and then claimed as the only inhabitant.

VML

"Connected brands across brand experience, customer experience, and commerce."

CEO Jon Cook has been publicly arguing that the definition of "creativity" needs to change to include CRM, commerce, and customer data. The category isn't being competed in — it's being redrawn.

Insight 02

Competitors have named their upstream value. MMGY hasn't yet.

Gale claims "business agency." VML claims "connected brands." BarkleyOKRP claims "big indie." Shipyard claims "engineering brand love." Even Miles and BVK have a labeled version of the strategic value they bring. MMGY has the ingredients — research, ecosystem perspective, performance evolution — but the lead claim ("we are travel") is an identity statement, not an articulation of upstream value.

Every competitor's labeled upstream value

Gale

"Business Agency."

The upstream value: strategic advisor on business outcomes, relieving CMOs of the hub role between business objectives and marketing tactics.

VML

"Connected brands."

The upstream value: an integrator that unifies brand, customer experience, and commerce — one shop instead of a roster.

BarkleyOKRP

"Big Indie."

The upstream value: a partner with the brave thinking of an independent and the operational backbone of a holding company.

Shipyard

"Engineering Brand Love."

The upstream value: a partner who designs behavior change rooted in audience data — not just creative output.

Miles Partnership

"Focused exclusively on travel and tourism."

The upstream value: category specialization that informs every recommendation. Paper-thin as differentiation, but named.

BVK

"Values-based brand positioning."

The upstream value: a proprietary methodology, grounded in neuroscience and consumer behavior, that informs every engagement.

Karsh Hagan + Madden

"Bold creative + data-driven place marketing."

The upstream value: independent creative paired with place-specific data — DMO-specific strategic counsel.

Insight 03

They've paired creativity with something more substantive.

Engineering Brand Love. Business Agency. Brand experience, customer experience, and commerce. Each of these words gives creativity substance — pairing it with rigor, accountability, or outcomes. MMGY has the assets to do the same kind of pairing — research, performance, ecosystem reach — but the current claim doesn't pair anything.

The evidence

Shipyard

Creativity + engineering.

"Engineering Brand Love" deliberately pairs an emotional outcome with a rigor-implying verb. The word "engineering" does the heavy lifting — it signals discipline alongside the warmth.

BarkleyOKRP

Creativity + scale.

"Big Indie" pairs creative independence with operating scale. Their messaging consistently reinforces both halves — independent enough to do brave work, big enough to deliver it reliably.

Gale

Creativity + business outcomes.

Creative is one of their disciplines but it's never the lead claim. The claim is "business agency" — creativity is the means, measurable revenue impact is the end.

VML

Creativity + commerce.

The pairing is explicit in their positioning — creative integrated with customer experience and commerce. Creativity alone isn't the deliverable; the connected outcome is.

Insight 04

What MMGY combines that others typically don't.

Deep work on the demand side. Deep work on the booking side. Global reach. 35 years of traveler research. Most competitors have one or two. Shipyard has demand and booking — but their travel/tourism portfolio is California-concentrated. Network agencies have global scale — but not the travel depth. The DMO specialists tend to own one side; the creative shops the other. MMGY's combination stands apart.

How the matrix breaks down on this

Shipyard

Both sides — but California.

Demand-side: San Diego Tourism, Mammoth Lakes, Visit Napa, Visit SLO CAL (and Visit California until Gale's win). Booking-side: In-N-Out, San Diego Gas & Electric, Veloz. The most credible "both sides" competitor — but their footprint is regional.

VML

Global scale, limited travel depth.

26,000+ people across 50+ markets. Strong booking-side capability for global brands. Travel category exposure (Tennessee Tourism, hospitality thought leadership) but no claim to deep ecosystem expertise.

Miles, BVK, Karsh+Madden

Deep demand-side, light booking-side.

Strong DMO portfolios. The booking-side relationships (hotels, cruise, airlines) are limited or non-existent. They see one side of the equation well.

BarkleyOKRP

Booking-side without travel.

Strong national brand portfolio (Burger King, Planet Fitness, Wingstop). Limited travel category presence. A hotel or airline CMO would consider them on integrated capability, not category fit.

MMGY

All four — demand, booking, global, research.

Deep DMO work (70%). Growing booking-side work across hospitality, cruise, airlines (30%). Global footprint. 35 years of proprietary traveler research. The combination stands apart in the matrix.

Where MMGY sits today

"We are travel. Travel changes everything."

An identity statement. It communicates passion for the category, but doesn't claim a category, doesn't pair creativity with a more substantive word, and doesn't articulate the upstream value MMGY brings beyond knowing travel well.

Underneath: 35 years of proprietary traveler research. The only agency seeing both demand-side and booking-side work at global scale. A performance-marketing evolution that's not yet visible in the brand. The ingredients are there — the work of today's session is to compress them into a claim.

Competitor matrix

The full set.

Each agency below appears with its lead positioning claim and the axis it's playing on. Click any row to expand. Use the filters to narrow the conversation.

Filter
Agency Lead positioning claim Playing on Segment
MMGY "We are travel." Category identity Travel integrated
What they claim

An identity statement — "We are travel. Travel changes everything." Communicates passion for the category but not what a prospect gains by hiring MMGY.

What's actually defensible underneath

35 years of proprietary traveler research, the only agency seeing both demand (DMO) and booking (private-sector) sides of the ecosystem at global scale, and a performance-marketing evolution that's not yet visible in the brand.

Workshop tension

The category claim is the floor competitors expect, not the ceiling buyers reward. The defensible assets underneath need to do the lifting the lead claim currently can't.

Miles Partnership "Focused exclusively on travel and tourism." Category + AI energy DMO-focused
What they claim

Pure category specialization, dialed up by visible energy around AI and destination optimization.

What's new

Investment in Downs & St. Germain Research — explicitly trying to build the research credibility MMGY already has.

Where they intersect MMGY

MMGY typically loses to Miles when Miles packages a simpler story. Functionally interchangeable lead claims; the difference comes down to clarity of articulation.

Karsh Hagan + Madden Media "Boldly independent creative" + "data-driven place marketing." DMO creative + data DMO-focused
What's new (Nov 2025)

Karsh Hagan and Madden Media formed a partnership combining Karsh's Denver creative legacy with Madden's data-driven, place-based marketing — effectively a single combined entity in the DMO market.

Combined roster

Colorado Tourism Office (40+ years AOR), VISIT DENVER, Denver International Airport, Inspirato, Telluride Tourism Board, Aspen Skiing Company — plus Madden's hundreds of DMO clients nationally.

What it signals

The DMO middle market is consolidating its own creative + data play. Structurally what MMGY does, executed at a different price point and in a more regional footprint.

BVK "Values-based brand positioning." A proprietary methodology Travel integrated
What they claim

Brands built around a core human value outperform those built around features — backed by research grounded in neuroscience and consumer behavior.

Why this matters

The most intellectually differentiated positioning in the set. Every piece of BVK content reinforces the same thesis. A prospect who reads three BVK posts comes away knowing what makes BVK different. MMGY's content doesn't yet do that cumulative work.

Love Communications Full-service, tourism-credentialed. Regional generalism DMO-focused
Where they compete

Salt Lake City-based, ~50 staff. Tourism portfolio includes Utah Office of Tourism, Virginia Tourism Corporation, Travel South Dakota.

Pattern

Wins MMGY briefs that favor personal attention and local-market knowledge over global scale.

Shipyard "Engineering Brand Love." Creative + data + behavior change Big creative shop
What's new

Opened a San Diego headquarters in March 2025 and now calls itself "California's agency." ~400 staff across 9 offices.

Travel roster

San Diego Tourism Authority (since 2007), Mammoth Lakes Tourism, Visit Napa Valley, Visit SLO CAL — plus Visit California, until Gale won the AOR.

Why they're the most-watched

The most direct, fastest-moving creative competitor in the matrix. Messaging is almost entirely outcome-language — no "we are travel" identity claims. A sharper version of what MMGY is trying to claim.

BarkleyOKRP "Big Indie." The middle space — scale with soul Big creative shop
Scale

~700 staff across six US offices. Acquired performance shop Adlucent in May 2024 to extend Big Indie into data and performance. MissionOne Media now manages $1B+ in billings.

The uncomfortable parallel

"Big Indie" is the exact structural territory MMGY described in the intake as "the valuable middle space — more integrated and accountable than networks, more durable and scalable than boutiques." BarkleyOKRP is already articulating that position publicly, without travel category depth behind it.

VML "Connected brands" across brand experience, customer experience, and commerce. Centralization at scale Big creative shop
Scale

~26,000 people across 50+ markets. WPP-owned. Formed 2023 from Wunderman Thompson + VMLY&R.

The argument they're making

CEO Jon Cook publicly redefining creativity to mean brand experience, customer experience, and commerce — not advertising. The pitch to large clients is centralization: replace your roster with one shop that has every tool in the toolkit.

Where they intersect MMGY

Not on category. On scale and on the consolidation pitch. The structural threat when a private-sector CMO is told by procurement to consolidate agencies — pure media buying power and global reach.

Gale "The industry's only Business Agency." Measurable business outcomes Performance specialist
The freshest signal

Gale just won Visit California AOR. The 25-year incumbent (Shipyard) lost. Gale isn't a creative famous-name shop and isn't a travel specialist. They're Stagwell's "Business Agency."

The positioning

Positions itself as something other than "integrated agency" — claiming a pocket between traditional agencies and management consultancies. Built on data + creative + media + technology — all anchored on measurable business outcomes. 2024 Campaign U.S. Advertising Agency of the Year. 2025 Ad Age Business Transformation Agency of the Year.

Why it matters most

The Visit California win isn't a creative-fame loss. It's a loss to the exact territory MMGY's April strategy said the agency wanted to claim. The positioning hypothesis has to do more than promise outcomes — Gale already does, in travel, on the highest-profile account in the country.

72andSunny Creative excellence + cultural relevance. Famous creative Big creative shop
Why they're here

A creative famous-name shop worth holding in mind without overweighting. "Creative fame" is a real competitive vector but not the most pressing one across the active competitive set today.

Havas, Assembly, PMG, Booyah Data + media at network scale. Media buying power Performance specialist
How they show up

Havas appears when the media budget gets big enough — pure buying power and global scale. Assembly and PMG show up at smaller scale. Booyah on pure performance briefs. None compete on travel category expertise; they compete on the media slice.

The competitive pattern

This category is the threat MMGY can't compete with on media buying power alone. The network agencies will out-buy MMGY at scale.

FINN, Black Diamond, Praytell, Sparkloft Earned media + comms specialty. PR-led entry points PR specialist
Why they're in the active set

These shops compete on the slice that MMGY itself calls the "tip of the spear for growth" — not background, not noise.

What that means

PR-specialist losses don't just cost MMGY a PR slice. They cost the entry-point engagements that grow into integrated retainers. Front-door competition, not background.

Two starting hypotheses

Two ways to claim the territory.

Two genuinely different bets — not two phrasings of the same idea. Click into each to explore it in depth, then compare them side by side below.

Direction one · own the territory

The only traveler intelligence from both sides of the booking.

A category-of-one claim grounded in what nobody else can match — full ecosystem reach across destinations and brands, with proprietary intelligence underneath both sides.

Explore this direction

Direction two · invent the category

We shape how people choose.

A category-creator move beyond travel. The agency built to understand and shape complex consumer decisions — with travel as the proof, not the limit.

Explore this direction

Side-by-side comparison.

Direction 1
Direction 2
The move
Claim what nobody else can credibly claim. Make MMGY the undisputed leader in the category MMGY already plays in.
Step beyond the existing category entirely. Name a new one MMGY can own and grow into.
What category does this claim?
Travel and tourism — but as a category-of-one. "The only traveler intelligence from both sides of the booking."
Decision-shaping — category-agnostic. Travel becomes the proof, not the category.
What it leans on
The structural truth that no competitor has both sides + global reach + proprietary intelligence underneath. The matrix proves it.
What MMGY already does — selling decision intelligence through EurekA!, Portrait of American Travelers, partnerships built around evidence-based marketing.
Strength
Most defensible. Built on real, existing structural advantages that competitors would have to acquire over decades to match.
Most expansive. Opens an addressable market that travel-specific positioning closes off — hospitality, financial services, retail, anywhere consumer choice matters.
Risk
Stays inside the travel category — and private-sector CMOs increasingly hire on broader business expertise, not category specialization.
Asks MMGY to lead with a claim broader than its work history. Requires the brand expression to back the boldness of the move.
Closest competitor
Nobody directly. Shipyard's "both sides" claim is regional; network agencies have scale but no travel depth.
Gale's "Business Agency." Same structural pattern (invent a category, own it). Different category claimed.

Direction one · own the territory

The only traveler intelligence from both sides of the booking.

MMGY operates across the full traveler ecosystem — destinations creating demand, brands capturing booking — with proprietary intelligence underneath both sides. No other agency has the structural reach to gather it. No other agency has the depth to make sense of it. This isn't a claim about access to research. It's a claim about a vantage point only MMGY occupies.

Nobody else can credibly say the same thing.

Shipyard claims "both sides" — but their travel/tourism portfolio is California-concentrated. VML has global scale — but no travel category depth. The DMO specialists own one side; the creative shops own the other. The matrix shows MMGY is the only agency with full ecosystem reach plus category authority. The claim is genuinely uncontested.

Account leadership through judgment, not just data.

Portrait of American Travelers, in its 35th year, and EurekA! make MMGY's traveler intelligence visible to clients and the industry alike. But AI has made data more accessible than ever — what it hasn't made accessible is judgment. Recognizing which patterns matter, when they matter, and what to do about them comes from 35 years of seeing the category from both sides. And that judgment is exactly what clients say they want from a partner: someone who interprets what's happening, recommends what to do, and helps them act before the market moves past them.

Private-sector growth is built in, not bolted on.

MMGY's stated growth priority is private-sector work — hospitality, cruise, airlines, brands that capture the booking. "Both sides of the booking" makes that work integral to MMGY's claim, not an extension of it. The growth doesn't require a new positioning. It requires the existing one to be claimed more confidently.

For a DMO buyer

Confirms what they already believe — and sharpens it.

The DMO buyer hires MMGY because nobody else understands destination marketing this deeply. This direction confirms that — and adds the booking-side knowledge as a reason MMGY's demand work is sharper than any competitor's.

For a private-sector CMO

A structural advantage that competitors can't match.

A hospitality or airline CMO doesn't hire MMGY because of travel expertise. They hire MMGY because they get an intelligence advantage no other agency can replicate — a partner who sees the full picture of how customers find, choose, and book.

Direction two · invent the category

We shape how people choose.

MMGY has spent 35 years getting unusually good at understanding how people decide. That work happened in travel — one of the highest-stakes, most emotionally complex decision categories there is. But the expertise travels. Wherever consumer choice is being shaped, MMGY is built to do that work. Travel is the proof. Not the limit.

MMGY already sells decision intelligence.

EurekA! — MMGY's own AI-powered subscription product — describes itself as helping subscribers "discover what drives travelers' decisions, where they're spending their money." Portrait of American Travelers, in its 35th year, is the industry's most established study of decision behavior. The positioning isn't a leap. It's a name for what MMGY already does and already productizes.

MMGY is built for account leadership.

Clients told us they don't want more reports. They want judgment. A partner who interprets what's happening, recommends what to do, and helps them act before the market moves past them. Shaping decisions requires exactly that posture — not service delivery, but decision partnership.

The category is genuinely uncontested.

Search the marketing agency landscape and no one claims this territory. Gale claims "business outcomes." VML claims "connected brands." Nobody claims the moment of choice itself. MMGY can name a category — and own it outright the moment the claim is made.

It opens the addressable market.

Travel becomes the proof, not the limit. Any category where complex consumer choice matters becomes addressable — hospitality, financial services, healthcare, retail experiences, entertainment. The agency's growth ceiling stops being defined by category size.

For a DMO buyer

An agency that thinks about their problem differently than other agencies do.

The DMO buyer's real job is to shape traveler choice — get travelers to choose their destination. "We shape how people choose" speaks to that job in a way "travel marketing agency" never could. It also reframes MMGY's value as strategic, not categorical.

For a private-sector CMO

Category-agnostic at the lead. Category-credentialed in the proof.

A hotel CMO no longer hears "travel agency, not a fit for our broader brand work." They hear "decision agency, with deep credentialed expertise in our category." Category indifference at the lead, with category authority in the proof, opens doors that travel-specific positioning can't.

Messaging pillars

Content territories per direction.

These are draft messaging pillars built to anchor MMGY's content marketing — each one a topical territory MMGY can own and produce thought leadership against. Two sets, one per positioning direction, to make the implications of each choice concrete. Click any pillar to explore the territory, the case for it, and a richer set of sample topics. The April pillars are preserved below for reference.

Direction one · own the territory

If MMGY claims "the only traveler intelligence from both sides of the booking"...

Pillar 01

The Demand-to-Booking Connection

Content that traces the link between destination demand and brand booking — what triggers it, what breaks it, what brands and destinations can do about it. The pillar nobody else can credibly write in.

Why MMGY can own this territory

No other agency operates on both sides of the booking. Specialists in destination marketing can only see the demand half. Specialists in brand/booking work can only see the conversion half. The dynamics MMGY can write about — handoffs, attribution mismatches, signals one side misses — are invisible from a single-side vantage point. This territory is closed to everyone else.

Sample topics

  • Why destination marketing campaigns are getting credit (and blame) for hotel bookings they didn't actually drive
  • The handoff problem: when a destination wins the dream and a brand loses the booking
  • What hotel performance data tells us about destination marketing — and vice versa
  • The attribution gap nobody talks about: when DMO campaigns work but the data goes to OTAs
  • Reading a destination's traveler funnel through the brands operating in it
  • How a soft year for a destination shows up in brand data six months earlier

Pillar 02

Traveler Intelligence in the Moment

Content that turns proprietary research into in-market judgment for travel marketers. Not data dumps — interpretation, signals, what's moving and what to do about it.

Why MMGY can own this territory

Portrait of American Travelers, in its 35th year, is the most cited study of traveler behavior in the industry. EurekA! makes that intelligence accessible to clients and prospects alike. The body of work MMGY can draw from to write about traveler behavior is genuinely without parallel. The territory rewards the agency willing to interpret, not just publish — which is exactly the gap clients raised in the roundtable.

Sample topics

  • Three things the latest Portrait of American Travelers tells us about the next 12 months
  • The trip planning behavior nobody is talking about yet
  • What changed in traveler decision-making this quarter — and what to do about it
  • Generational travel research everyone gets wrong (and what it actually shows)
  • What the data says about value-driven travelers — and how brands should respond
  • The pattern repeating from 2008: what we learned then that matters now

Pillar 03

The Travel Marketer's Reality

Content built around the daily realities of being a travel marketing leader — what's on their desk, what's getting harder, what's working, what's changing. Where most agency content is built around the agency's services, this pillar is built around the client's role.

Why MMGY can own this territory

MMGY works alongside more travel marketing leaders — DMO CMOs, hospitality VPs, tourism board executives — than almost any other agency. The lived knowledge of how those roles work, what's changing in them, and what the day-to-day pressures look like is proprietary by accumulation. Most agency thought leadership talks about marketing as a discipline; this pillar talks about marketing as a job.

Sample topics

  • What a tourism board CMO actually does all day
  • The five conversations every hospitality marketing leader is having in 2026
  • How tourism marketing teams are being restructured (and what's working)
  • The reports your CFO is reading — and what they're missing about your work
  • Inside the board presentation that worked: how one CVB CMO got Phase 2 approved
  • The hardest political problem in DMO marketing — and how leaders are solving it

Pillar 04

The Future of Travel Discovery

Content tracking how travel decisions are being made differently — AI-era search, zero-click discovery, social platforms eating SEO. A whitespace clients have flagged but nobody is clearly owning.

Why MMGY can own this territory

Travel is one of the highest-impact categories for AI-era discovery — high-research, high-consideration, high-emotional-investment purchases that travelers are increasingly handing to ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews. MMGY's vantage point on both sides of the booking makes the agency unusually positioned to write about what's happening at every step of that new discovery journey. Clients have explicitly flagged this as the territory nobody owns.

Sample topics

  • What ChatGPT actually says when travelers ask it where to go
  • The GEO playbook for tourism boards: where to start, what to skip
  • Zero-click is here. What that means for destination websites.
  • Why hotel rate parity is breaking under AI-driven booking assistants
  • The new category page: how destinations are showing up in AI answer engines
  • Three questions every CMO should be asking about AI-era discovery this quarter

Direction two · invent the category

If MMGY claims "we shape how people choose"...

Pillar 01

The Anatomy of a Decision

Content that breaks down how complex consumer decisions actually get made — the inputs, the influences, the moments that matter. Travel decisions are the primary case study, but the principles apply across categories.

Why MMGY can own this territory

35 years of studying travel decisions gives MMGY a deeper body of evidence on consumer choice than almost any agency in the market. Travel is unusually instructive — high-consideration, emotional, long planning cycles, complex tradeoffs. The patterns learned there are transferable to financial services, healthcare, retail experiences, and other categories where complex choice matters. This is MMGY's bid to be the agency that thinks most rigorously about how people decide.

Sample topics

  • What we learned about decision-making from 35 years of studying travelers
  • Inside the consideration set: how brands actually make it onto a shortlist
  • The five most underrated forces in consumer decision-making
  • Why people choose: when emotion overrides every other variable
  • The decision moments hidden inside a single purchase
  • What travel can teach financial services about high-stakes consumer choice

Pillar 02

Decisions in the AI Era

Content tracking how AI is changing the architecture of consumer choice — what people ask AI, what AI tells them, what brands need to do about it. Positioned for a moment when every CMO is asking the same question without finding satisfying answers.

Why MMGY can own this territory

Travel is a leading-edge category for AI-era consumer behavior. Travelers are using AI to plan, compare, and decide at higher rates than buyers in most other industries. That gives MMGY the working knowledge to write authoritatively about AI's impact on consumer choice — using travel as the proving ground, but with relevance to any category facing the same disruption. The topic is urgent across the CMO market, and nobody is clearly owning it yet.

Sample topics

  • What 1,000 ChatGPT travel searches told us about how AI talks about brands
  • GEO isn't SEO. Here's what changes when AI is the discovery layer.
  • The five things brands should be doing now to show up in AI-era discovery
  • Why AI assistants are killing certain kinds of brand marketing — and lifting others
  • The new path to consideration: how AI shapes the brands consumers even know to compare
  • What every CMO should be testing in their AI presence this quarter

Pillar 03

Decisions Don't Care About the Funnel

The way most marketing is organized — brand on one side, performance on the other — doesn't match how customers actually choose. A traveler weighing where to go is doing brand-level reasoning and price-level reasoning at the same time. MMGY's content territory is what good marketing looks like when those two halves are treated as one decision — and what gets missed when they're not.

Why MMGY can own this territory

MMGY's both-sides-of-the-booking heritage is structurally unusual: the agency was built to operate across what most marketers organize as separate functions. That gives the agency standing to write about the brand/performance divide without sounding self-serving — because MMGY doesn't actually have the divide most of its competitors have. This is a contrarian territory, but a credible one.

Sample topics

  • The funnel is a management tool. It's not how decisions get made.
  • What brand teams miss when they hand off to performance — and what performance teams miss when they don't get a brief
  • Why mid-funnel content keeps disappointing both sides
  • The conversation brand and performance leads should be having (but aren't)
  • How to brief creative when the decision is non-linear
  • What measurement looks like when the funnel doesn't actually exist

Pillar 04

The Agency Relationship, Rebuilt

The relationship between CMOs and agencies is changing faster than at any point in 20 years. MMGY's content territory: making the case for the modern decision partnership, not just defending the agency's position.

Why MMGY can own this territory

Most agencies can't credibly write about agency-model evolution — they're either too entrenched in the AOR era to acknowledge the shift, or too small to have the standing to define what's replacing it. MMGY sits in a useful middle: established enough to have credibility, modern enough to be reshaping how it works with clients. Clients' own roundtable feedback about wanting "account leadership, not account service" is content gold for this pillar.

Sample topics

  • The AOR is dead. What's replacing it?
  • How procurement is changing what CMOs can actually hire — and what it means for the work
  • What a decision partner does that an AOR doesn't
  • The fractional CMO era: what happens when the buyer changes every 18 months
  • Why your agency should be helping you make decisions, not just present options
  • What good client-agency partnership actually looks like in 2026

For reference · the April pillars

The pillars from the April strategy presentation. Preserved here as the starting point. Each new set above is a candidate evolution, not a replacement until we decide together.

April 01

We See the Whole Traveler

Nobody knows travelers like MMGY does — through 35 years of proprietary research, work spanning destinations and private-sector brands, and global teams that understand how travelers think and decide at every stage.

April 02

We See Both Sides of the Booking

DMOs create demand but can't measure where the bookings land. Private-sector brands capture bookings but can't create new demand alone. MMGY works both sides — making the work smarter on both sides.

April 03

Complexity Is Our Arena

Travel marketing is getting more complex — fragmented channels, AI disruption, compressed buying cycles. Most agencies position complexity as a problem to simplify. MMGY positions it as terrain it's uniquely equipped to navigate.

April 04

The Future of Travel Discovery

AI is reshaping how travelers find destinations and how CMOs find agencies. MMGY already has ChatGPT referrals in inbound leads and AI-powered tools like Trailblazer and EurekA!. The agency isn't just adapting to AI — it's helping clients navigate the shift.

The afternoon session

Which set carries forward — and what evolves from there?

Whatever positioning direction we land on this morning shapes the pillars we develop this afternoon. The two new sets above are starting points — not finished proposals. The April pillars stay in view so we can see what carries forward, what evolves, and what changes entirely.